Easy2Siksha

GNDU Question Paper-2022

B.A 2

Semester

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

(Indian Administration)

Time Allowed: Two Hours Maximum Marks: 100

Note: There are Eight questions of equal marks. Candidates are required to attempt any

Four questions

SECTION-A

1. Indian Administration is a Quasi-Federalism. Discuss.

2. Describe Financial Relations between Union and States.

SECTION-B

3. Discuss the appointment, powers, functions and position of President of India.

4. Discuss the organization and functions of the Central Secretariat.

SECTION-C

5. Discuss the composition, powers and functions of State Legislative Assembly.

6. Discuss the appointment and role of Deputy Commissioner.

Easy2Siksha

SECTION-D

7. Discuss the issues of Generalist versus Specialist in detail.

8. Critically evaluate the relationship between permanent and political executive.

Easy2Siksha

GNDU Answer Paper-2022

B.A 2

Semester

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

(Indian Administration)

Time Allowed: Two Hours Maximum Marks: 100

Note: There are Eight questions of equal marks. Candidates are required to attempt any

Four questions

SECTION-A

1. Indian Administration is a Quasi-Federalism. Discuss.

Ans: Indian Administration and Quasi-Federalism: A Detailed Explanation

In the context of Indian administration, the term "quasi-federalism" refers to the unique

system of governance that blends elements of both federalism and unitarism. It signifies a

system where power is shared between central and state governments, but the central

government holds significant authority, often overriding the states in certain situations. This

model is not purely federal, as seen in countries like the United States, nor entirely unitary,

as seen in countries like France. Instead, Indian federalism lies in between, giving it a "quasi-

federal" character.

Understanding Federalism

Before we dive into quasi-federalism, it's important to first understand what federalism is.

Federalism is a political system where power is divided between two levels of government:

a central government and several regional or state governments. These governments share

authority over different aspects of governance, such as law, education, healthcare, and

finance. The United States is a classic example of a federal system where both the national

government and individual states have clearly defined powers.

In a federal system, the constitution typically outlines the division of powers between the

central government and the states. These powers are generally entrenched and cannot be

easily altered by one level of government without the consent of the other. This ensures

Easy2Siksha

that each level of government retains some degree of autonomy and can function

independently within its own jurisdiction.

Indian Quasi-Federalism

India’s system of governance is often described as "quasi-federal" because, while it has

federal characteristics, it also has several features of a unitary system. A unitary system is

one where most powers are concentrated in the central government, and the regional

governments (if any) are subordinate to the central authority. In India, although the

Constitution provides for a federal structure, the central government is much more

powerful than the state governments.

The Indian Constitution, which came into effect in 1950, lays the foundation for India’s

quasi-federal structure. This structure is not clearly federal like the United States or purely

unitary like France. Instead, it is a hybrid, with the central government playing a dominant

role. Let’s break down the key features that make Indian administration quasi-federal.

Key Features of Indian Quasi-Federalism

1. Single Constitution: India has only one Constitution that governs both the central

and state governments. In a traditional federal system, such as in the U.S., each state

has its own constitution in addition to the national constitution. The fact that all

states in India are governed by a single Constitution is a characteristic of a unitary

system, where the central government has more control.

2. Union List, State List, and Concurrent List: The division of powers in India is outlined

in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. It categorizes subjects into three lists:

o Union List: This list includes subjects on which only the central government

can legislate, such as defense, foreign affairs, and railways.

o State List: This list contains subjects on which only state governments can

legislate, such as police, public health, and agriculture.

o Concurrent List: This list includes subjects on which both the central and

state governments can legislate, such as criminal law, marriage, and

education.

While the state governments have authority over the subjects in the State List, the central

government can legislate on the subjects in the Concurrent List, often overriding the states

if necessary. This gives the central government a significant advantage.

3. Residuary Powers: The Indian Constitution grants the central government the

authority to legislate on any subject that is not mentioned in the Union, State, or

Concurrent Lists. These are called "residuary powers" and provide the central

government with the flexibility to make laws on new issues that may arise. This

further strengthens the central government's position and diminishes the autonomy

of states.

Easy2Siksha

4. Emergency Provisions: The Constitution of India gives the central government the

power to assume greater control over the states in times of emergency. There are

three types of emergencies outlined in the Constitution—National Emergency, State

Emergency (President’s Rule), and Financial Emergency. When a National Emergency

is declared, the central government can take over the governance of the entire

country, including the states. This unitary feature allows the central government to

override the states during times of crisis.

5. Discretionary Powers of the President: The President of India, who is the head of

state, has significant discretionary powers. These powers allow the President to act

independently of the advice of the Council of Ministers in certain situations, such as

when imposing President's Rule in a state. This further centralizes power in the

hands of the central government.

6. Centralized Financial Control: In India, most of the financial resources are controlled

by the central government. For example, while state governments can levy taxes, a

significant portion of revenue is collected by the central government and then

distributed to the states. The distribution of resources is not entirely independent, as

the central government plays a dominant role in shaping fiscal policies.

7. All India Services: The All India Services (AIS) include the Indian Administrative

Service (IAS), Indian Police Service (IPS), and Indian Forest Service (IFS). These

services are common to both the central and state governments, and officers from

these services work at both the national and state levels. This integration of services

reflects the central government’s influence over the administration in the states.

Examples of Quasi-Federalism in Practice

• The imposition of President’s Rule: An example of quasi-federalism in India is the

imposition of President's Rule in states when the state government is unable to

function effectively. This occurs when there is a breakdown of constitutional

machinery in a state, and the central government takes direct control. This central

intervention is a key feature of India's quasi-federal system.

• Financial control: Another example is the way the central government controls the

distribution of financial resources. While states have their own legislative powers,

they rely heavily on the central government for funds through grants, loans, and the

sharing of tax revenues.

• Legislation on Concurrent Subjects: In situations where both central and state

governments legislate on the same subject, the central law prevails in case of a

conflict. This reinforces the authority of the central government over the states,

especially when the central government feels it is in the national interest.

Conclusion

In conclusion, India's system of governance can be described as "quasi-federal" because it

combines elements of both federalism and unitarism. While there is a formal division of

Easy2Siksha

powers between the central and state governments, the central government holds

considerable authority, especially in times of crisis or when dealing with matters of national

interest. The Constitution of India creates a structure where the central government can

override state governments in specific situations, making it a unique blend of federal and

unitary features. This quasi-federal system has worked effectively in India due to its

flexibility, allowing for a balance between central control and regional autonomy.

2. Describe Financial Relations between Union and States.

Ans: Financial Relations Between the Union and States in India

In India, the financial relations between the Union (central government) and the States are

defined by the Constitution. These relations are a crucial part of the federal structure of the

country, and they determine how financial powers and resources are shared between the

central and state governments. Understanding these relations is key to understanding how

the Indian government functions, especially when it comes to revenue generation and

expenditure.

1. Division of Powers and Responsibilities

India follows a federal system of government, meaning that there is a division of powers

between the Union and the States. This division is outlined in the Constitution of India. The

financial relations between the Union and States are based on the principle of cooperative

federalism, which means that both levels of government work together, even though they

have distinct financial responsibilities.

There are three lists in the Constitution that categorize the subjects on which the Union

and States can legislate:

• Union List: Includes subjects on which only the Union government can legislate, such

as defense, foreign affairs, and national highways.

• State List: Includes subjects on which only the State governments can legislate, such

as police, public health, and agriculture.

• Concurrent List: Includes subjects on which both the Union and State governments

can legislate, such as education, marriage, and trade unions.

2. Sources of Revenue

Both the Union and State governments have their sources of revenue. The Constitution

specifies which taxes each level of government can levy. This division ensures that the Union

and States have the financial resources needed to fulfill their respective duties.

• Union Government’s Revenue Sources: The Union government has a wider range of

sources from which it collects revenue. Some of the main taxes it collects are:

Easy2Siksha

o Income Tax: Tax levied on individuals' and corporations' income.

o Customs Duty: Tax on imports and exports.

o Central Excise Duty: Tax on goods produced within the country.

o Service Tax: Tax on services rendered.

o Goods and Services Tax (GST): Though it is now a shared tax, the Union

government also collects a part of it.

• State Government’s Revenue Sources: States have their own sources of revenue,

which primarily come from taxes on goods and services, along with certain other

types of taxes, such as:

o Sales Tax (now part of GST, but states still have a share of it).

o Land Revenue: Tax on agricultural land.

o Stamp Duty: Tax on legal documents related to property transactions.

o Excise Duty on Liquor: Each state has the power to levy taxes on alcohol and

related products.

• Shared Revenue (GST): A significant reform to financial relations between the Union

and States is the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in 2017. GST is a

single tax that replaces several indirect taxes like sales tax, excise duty, and VAT.

Under GST, both the Union and States share the revenue generated. The division is

done based on a formula agreed upon by both parties.

3. The Finance Commission

The Finance Commission is an important body that plays a role in deciding the distribution

of financial resources between the Union and the States. The Finance Commission is set up

every five years under Article 280 of the Constitution. It is tasked with recommending how

the financial resources of the Union government should be shared with the States.

Some of the key responsibilities of the Finance Commission include:

• Recommending the distribution of tax revenues between the Union and States.

• Determining the allocation of funds for local bodies (such as municipalities and

panchayats).

• Suggesting measures for improving the financial position of the States.

The Finance Commission works based on factors such as the population of States, their

financial needs, and their revenue-raising capacities.

For example, when the Finance Commission allocates funds to States, it considers the

population of each State. States with larger populations may receive a higher share of the

revenue to address their greater needs.

Easy2Siksha

4. Grants-in-Aid

In addition to the revenue that States generate from their taxes, the Union government

provides grants-in-aid to the States. These are financial assistance or funds provided by the

central government to States for specific purposes, such as to improve education, health,

infrastructure, and poverty alleviation.

There are two types of grants:

• Conditional Grants: These are provided with certain conditions attached, meaning

the State must use the money for a specified purpose. For example, funds allocated

for health or education must be used only for those sectors.

• Unconditional Grants: These grants are given without any strings attached, allowing

States to use the money as they see fit to meet their needs.

Grants-in-aid are particularly important for States that have limited revenue resources and

are crucial for balancing the financial disparities between richer and poorer States.

5. The Role of Planning Commission (Now NITI Aayog)

The Planning Commission, which was replaced by the NITI Aayog in 2015, played a

significant role in financial relations. The Planning Commission used to allocate funds for

various development programs in States based on a central planning model. However, after

the formation of NITI Aayog, the role has shifted more towards fostering cooperative

federalism by helping States in policy formulation and suggesting best practices for

development. NITI Aayog emphasizes the idea of a more consultative and decentralized

approach to resource sharing.

6. Controlling Excessive Borrowing and Debt

While both the Union and the States are allowed to borrow money, the Constitution places

certain restrictions on States to prevent excessive borrowing and debt accumulation. The

Union government can borrow freely from the market or other sources, but States need

approval from the Union government if they want to borrow beyond certain limits. This

system ensures that States do not end up in unsustainable debt situations.

7. Financial Disparities Between States

One of the challenges in the financial relations between the Union and States is the disparity

in the financial capacities of different States. Some States, like Maharashtra, Gujarat, and

Tamil Nadu, are economically more advanced and generate more revenue, while other

States, like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Odisha, face greater poverty and generate less

revenue.

The role of the Finance Commission and the system of grants-in-aid helps in reducing these

disparities by redistributing resources in a way that supports the States in need. This

redistribution is necessary to ensure balanced development across the country.

Easy2Siksha

8. Conclusion

The financial relations between the Union and the States in India are carefully designed to

maintain a balance between centralization and decentralization. While the Union

government has more financial powers and resources, the States also have the ability to

collect taxes and receive financial assistance. The system is based on the principles of

cooperative federalism, where both levels of government are expected to collaborate for

the welfare of the people.

The Constitution’s provisions, along with the recommendations of the Finance Commission,

grants-in-aid, and other financial mechanisms, ensure that there is a fair distribution of

resources, which enables both the Union and States to fulfill their roles in the governance of

the country effectively. Despite the challenges posed by financial disparities, the system

seeks to ensure that all States, regardless of their economic standing, can benefit from the

country’s resources and work towards equitable development.

SECTION-B

3. Discuss the appointment, powers, functions and position of President of India.

Ans: Appointment, Powers, Functions, and Position of the President of India

The President of India is the ceremonial head of state and the supreme commander of the

armed forces. Though the role is largely symbolic and ceremonial, the President holds

significant powers in the Indian political system, especially during times of political crisis. In

this article, we will discuss the appointment, powers, functions, and position of the

President of India in detail, in a simple and easy-to-understand manner.

Appointment of the President

The President of India is elected through an indirect election process. This means that the

citizens of India do not vote for the President directly. Instead, the election is conducted by

an electoral college, which is made up of:

1. Elected members of both Houses of Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) – These

are the representatives who are chosen by the people of India.

2. Elected members of the Legislative Assemblies of States and Union Territories –

These include the state and union territory assemblies, whose members are also

elected by the people.

The election follows a system called "single transferable vote" (STV), which ensures that the

President is chosen based on the collective support of a majority in the electoral college.

The voting is done by secret ballot, and the candidate with the highest number of votes wins

the election.

Easy2Siksha

The President is elected for a term of 5 years but can be re-elected if they choose to stand

again and win. The qualification for becoming the President includes:

• The person must be a citizen of India.

• The person must be at least 35 years old.

• The person must be qualified to become a member of the Lok Sabha (the lower

house of Parliament).

• The person must not hold any office of profit under the Government of India or any

state government.

Powers of the President

While the President of India is considered the head of state, the powers of the President are

largely exercised on the advice of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers. In this

sense, the President's powers are mostly executive and ceremonial in nature, but they also

have some special powers. Let's break down the different types of powers:

1. Executive Powers

As the head of the executive branch of the Indian government, the President holds

significant executive powers:

• Appointments: The President appoints the Prime Minister and other ministers based

on the recommendation of the Prime Minister. The President also appoints

governors, judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, and the Election

Commissioners.

• Ordinary Executive Functions: The President approves policies, ordinances, and

administrative orders. In this regard, the President is the formal authority, but the

decisions are taken by the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.

• Commander-in-Chief: The President is the supreme commander of the Indian Armed

Forces. While military decisions are made by the government, the President plays a

ceremonial role in matters related to the military.

2. Legislative Powers

The President plays a role in the legislative process, though the actual legislative functions

are carried out by the Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha). The President has the

following legislative powers:

• Summoning and Proroguing the Parliament: The President has the power to

summon and prorogue (end) sessions of Parliament and to dissolve the Lok Sabha

(the lower house).

• Assent to Bills: A bill passed by both Houses of Parliament needs the President’s

assent to become a law. The President can either give their assent, withhold it, or

send the bill back for reconsideration.

Easy2Siksha

• Ordinance Power: When Parliament is not in session, the President can issue

ordinances (temporary laws) on matters that require immediate action. However,

ordinances must be approved by Parliament within six weeks after the session

begins.

3. Judicial Powers

The President holds judicial powers in the following ways:

• Appointing Judges: The President appoints the judges of the Supreme Court and

High Courts, following the advice of the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India.

• Granting Pardons: The President has the power to grant pardons, reprieves,

respites, or remissions of punishment, or to suspend, remit, or commute sentences,

especially in cases involving the death penalty.

4. Diplomatic and Military Powers

The President represents India in international forums and is responsible for matters related

to diplomacy and national defense. These powers include:

• Foreign Affairs: The President appoints ambassadors and receives foreign diplomats.

Though the actual conduct of foreign relations is done by the government, the

President plays a key ceremonial role.

• War and Peace: The President declares war and peace, but only on the advice of the

Cabinet.

5. Emergency Powers

The President’s most significant powers are exercised during national emergencies. There

are three types of emergencies that the President can declare:

• National Emergency (Article 352): This can be declared when the security of India or

any part of it is threatened by war, external aggression, or armed rebellion. It gives

the central government the power to take over the governance of states and extend

its powers.

• State Emergency (Article 356): This can be declared if a state government is unable

to function according to the provisions of the Constitution. In such cases, President's

Rule is imposed, and the state is governed by the President through a Union

government-appointed administrator.

• Financial Emergency (Article 360): This can be declared if there is a threat to the

financial stability or credit of India. It allows the central government to control the

financial institutions and resources of states.

Functions of the President

The functions of the President can be categorized into several areas based on their

constitutional role. Some important functions include:

Easy2Siksha

• Ceremonial Functions: These include functions such as the inauguration of

Parliament, receiving foreign dignitaries, and addressing the nation on important

occasions, such as Republic Day and Independence Day.

• Legislative Functions: As mentioned earlier, the President's role in the legislative

process includes summoning Parliament, giving assent to bills, and issuing

ordinances when necessary.

• Discretionary Functions: In exceptional situations, the President can exercise their

powers according to their discretion. For example, in a hung Parliament, the

President may appoint a Prime Minister who they believe can command the majority

of the House, even if it is not the largest party.

Position of the President

The position of the President of India is largely ceremonial, and the real power rests with

the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers. This is because India follows a

parliamentary democracy system, where executive authority is vested in the Council of

Ministers headed by the Prime Minister.

The President, therefore, acts as a constitutional head who symbolizes the unity and

integrity of the nation. Though they have the formal power to make decisions, in practice,

all decisions are taken on the advice of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. The President's

role is crucial in maintaining the balance of power between the various branches of

government and upholding the Constitution.

In times of political instability, however, the President’s role becomes more significant. For

example, the President can take critical decisions such as dismissing a government or

dissolving the Lok Sabha, but these actions are often done under the advice of the Prime

Minister.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the President of India is the head of state, symbolizing the nation's unity and

serving as a ceremonial figurehead. While the President has several powers in areas like

legislation, executive functions, and judiciary, the real authority lies with the Prime Minister

and the Council of Ministers. The President's role becomes crucial during times of political

crisis or emergency, where their powers may be exercised to maintain stability in the

country. Though mostly ceremonial, the position of the President holds great significance in

the Indian political system, ensuring the smooth functioning of the democratic framework.

Easy2Siksha

4. Discuss the of the Central Secretariat.

Ans: Organization and Functions organization and functions of the Central Secretariat

The Central Secretariat is the backbone of the Indian administrative system, playing a crucial

role in the functioning of the Indian government. It is the main body where the central

government’s bureaucratic activities are managed and coordinated. The Secretariat houses

the offices of senior government officials, including those in the executive branch who help

implement the policies and decisions made by the government.

To understand the organization and functions of the Central Secretariat, we can break it

down into two broad parts: its structure (organization) and its role (functions).

1. Organization of the Central Secretariat

The Central Secretariat is organized in a hierarchical manner, with a clear division of

responsibilities among various departments and ministries. At the top, there are senior

government officials who oversee the functioning of the Secretariat, and below them, there

are specialized divisions that deal with specific areas of government work.

Ministries and Departments

The Central Secretariat consists of several ministries, which are further divided into

departments. Each ministry is headed by a Minister, and each department is headed by a

Secretary. The ministries are responsible for formulating policies, while the departments

implement them.

For example:

• The Ministry of Finance has departments such as the Department of Economic

Affairs and the Department of Revenue.

• The Ministry of Home Affairs has departments like the Department of Internal

Security and the Department of Official Language.

Secretaries and Under-Secretaries

• Secretaries are the highest-ranking officials in the Central Secretariat and have the

responsibility of overseeing the day-to-day administration and policy

implementation in their respective departments. They are usually Indian

Administrative Service (IAS) officers and serve as the main link between the political

leadership (the ministers) and the bureaucratic machinery.

• Below the Secretaries are Additional Secretaries, Joint Secretaries, and Under-

Secretaries who assist in managing the work of the ministry and department. These

officials help in drafting policy decisions, organizing meetings, and implementing

various government schemes.

Easy2Siksha

Other Supporting Staff

Apart from the senior officers, the Secretariat also includes various clerical staff, assistants,

typists, and data entry operators. These officials perform routine office work, file

management, and record-keeping, which are essential for the smooth functioning of the

Secretariat.

Cabinet Secretariat

The Cabinet Secretariat is an important part of the Central Secretariat. It acts as a link

between the government and the Cabinet, which is the decision-making body of the

government. The Cabinet Secretariat ensures that Cabinet decisions are implemented and

helps organize meetings between ministers. The Cabinet Secretary, the highest bureaucratic

post in India, heads the Cabinet Secretariat.

Other Key Bodies

• Prime Minister’s Office (PMO): While not formally a part of the Central Secretariat,

the PMO plays an important role in coordinating the work of the Secretariat. The

PMO supports the Prime Minister in his administrative work and coordinates

between different ministries.

• Planning Commission / NITI Aayog: The Planning Commission (now replaced by the

NITI Aayog) was another key body for planning and coordination at the central level,

working with various ministries to formulate policies and ensure their

implementation.

2. Functions of the Central Secretariat

The Central Secretariat plays a vital role in the day-to-day functioning of the Indian

government. Its main functions are:

Policy Formulation and Decision Making

One of the most important functions of the Central Secretariat is the formulation of policies

and advice for the Cabinet. The Secretaries and other senior officers prepare proposals and

draft policies that are sent to the Cabinet for approval. For example, the Ministry of Health

formulates policies related to public health, and the Ministry of Education works on policies

related to the education system.

Implementation of Government Programs

After the Cabinet approves policies, it is the responsibility of the Central Secretariat to

ensure that these policies are implemented across the country. For instance, if the

government decides to launch a new welfare program, such as providing free food grains to

the poor, the relevant ministry (such as the Ministry of Food and Public Distribution) will

oversee the distribution process.

Easy2Siksha

Coordination Between Different Ministries

Since different ministries work on various aspects of governance, the Central Secretariat

also ensures effective coordination between them. For example, if there is a national

disaster, the Ministry of Home Affairs might coordinate with the Ministry of Health and the

Ministry of Defence to ensure timely relief efforts. The Cabinet Secretariat plays an

important role in ensuring smooth inter-ministerial coordination.

Administration of Government Orders and Instructions

The Central Secretariat is also responsible for issuing administrative orders and instructions

that must be followed by various government offices. For example, when the government

announces a new policy or law, it is the Secretariat’s role to ensure that these orders are

circulated to all the relevant departments and are properly implemented.

Record-Keeping and Documentation

The Central Secretariat maintains all official records of the central government. It is

responsible for keeping documents such as Cabinet minutes, official orders, policy drafts,

and other important files. For example, a file may be created for the discussion and approval

of a new law, and this file will be maintained by the relevant department within the

Secretariat for future reference.

Advisory Role

The Central Secretariat provides expert advice to ministers and other government officials.

Secretaries, who are experienced civil servants, are often called upon to advise ministers on

important issues or to suggest the course of action in policy matters. They may also appear

before committees of Parliament to answer questions about the functioning of their

ministries.

Public Interaction and Publicity

Although the Central Secretariat primarily deals with internal government matters, it also

plays a role in managing public communication. It helps draft press releases, handle media

inquiries, and ensure that the public is informed about important government policies and

decisions. For example, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is responsible for

managing government publicity.

Providing Administrative Support to the Parliament

The Central Secretariat also provides support to the Parliament in terms of preparing

documents and answering questions raised by Members of Parliament. The work of

preparing reports and responses to parliamentary questions is done by the relevant

departments in the Secretariat.

3. Examples and Analogies

To make the functioning of the Central Secretariat more relatable, think of it as the

headquarters of a large company, where all the major decisions are made, and tasks are

Easy2Siksha

coordinated. Just as a company has a CEO who is supported by different departments

(finance, HR, marketing), the Central Secretariat has a Cabinet Secretary supported by

various ministries and departments, each with their specific areas of focus.

For example, if the government needs to implement a new scheme to improve road

infrastructure, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH) within the Secretariat

will play a leading role. Similarly, the Ministry of Finance will allocate funds, and the Ministry

of Urban Development may oversee the infrastructure development in cities.

Conclusion

The Central Secretariat is a vital part of the Indian administration, ensuring that the

government’s policies are formulated, implemented, and coordinated efficiently. Its

organizational structure includes ministries, departments, and various levels of officials who

play specific roles. Through its various functions, the Secretariat helps maintain the smooth

functioning of the government, ensuring that decisions made by the political leadership are

translated into action.

SECTION-C

5. Discuss the composition, powers and functions of State Legislative Assembly.

Ans: Composition, Powers, and Functions of the State Legislative Assembly

The State Legislative Assembly is a key institution in the functioning of state governments in

India. It plays a vital role in the democratic process by representing the people of the state

and making laws on various matters. It is similar to the Lok Sabha (the lower house of

Parliament) at the national level, but its focus is on state-specific issues.

Let's break down the composition, powers, and functions of the State Legislative Assembly

in detail:

Composition of the State Legislative Assembly

The State Legislative Assembly is made up of elected representatives from different

constituencies within a state. These members are known as Members of the Legislative

Assembly (MLAs). Here’s how it is structured:

1. Membership:

o The number of members in a State Legislative Assembly varies from state to

state. The total number of MLAs in any state is determined by the population

of the state.

o For example, Uttar Pradesh has the largest Legislative Assembly, with 403

members, while smaller states like Sikkim have fewer members, with just 32.

Easy2Siksha

2. Elections:

o MLAs are elected through direct elections. Each member represents a

particular constituency (a specific area within the state).

o These elections are conducted using the first-past-the-post system, where

the candidate who gets the highest number of votes in a constituency wins

the seat.

3. Term:

o The State Legislative Assembly has a five-year term, unless it is dissolved

earlier by the Governor (in case of a political crisis or instability).

4. Leadership:

o The Speaker is the head of the Assembly and is responsible for maintaining

order during debates and ensuring that the rules are followed.

o The Chief Minister (elected from the majority party or coalition) is the head

of the government, while the Governor is the constitutional head of the

state. The Governor appoints the Chief Minister, but the Chief Minister

derives their authority from the Assembly.

Powers of the State Legislative Assembly

The powers of the State Legislative Assembly can be classified into three main categories:

1. Legislative Powers:

o The most important function of the Assembly is to make laws. The Assembly

passes laws on a wide range of matters, including education, health,

agriculture, and local governance, but these must be in line with the

Constitution of India.

o The laws passed by the Assembly only apply to the state. For example, laws

related to local education policies, health services, and police procedures are

made by the State Legislative Assembly.

2. Financial Powers:

o The State Legislative Assembly controls the finances of the state. This

includes passing the state budget and approving the allocation of funds for

various government departments and schemes.

o The Assembly’s power over finances is significant because no money can be

spent by the government without its approval. For instance, if the state

government wants to build roads or provide subsidies for farmers, it must get

the approval of the Legislative Assembly.

o The Governor introduces the State Budget in the Assembly, which is then

discussed and passed. The vote on account is another financial power, where

Easy2Siksha

the government gets permission to spend a certain amount of money before

the full budget is passed.

3. Control Over the Executive:

o The State Legislative Assembly has the power to hold the government

accountable for its actions. MLAs can ask questions, raise issues, and debate

policies.

o The Chief Minister and other ministers are accountable to the Assembly. If

the government loses the support of the majority of MLAs, it can be forced to

resign. This is how the Assembly can influence the functioning of the state

government.

o The vote of no-confidence is a powerful tool available to the Assembly. If the

government fails to win a vote of confidence, it is considered to have lost the

support of the Assembly, and the government must resign.

Functions of the State Legislative Assembly

The functions of the State Legislative Assembly are broad and include legislative, executive,

and financial responsibilities. Let’s look at each function in more detail:

1. Making Laws:

o One of the primary functions of the State Legislative Assembly is to make

laws on subjects under the State List in the Constitution. These include

matters that are relevant to the day-to-day governance of the state, such as

police, public health, education, and transport.

o The Assembly also plays a role in making laws on subjects in the Concurrent

List, which can be dealt with by both the State and Central Legislatures.

However, if there is a conflict between state and central laws, the central law

prevails.

o For instance, the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly might pass a law related

to urban transport that affects the local trains or buses within the state.

2. Approving the Budget:

o The State Legislative Assembly is responsible for approving the state’s

budget. The budget details how the state government plans to spend its

money in the coming year.

o The government must present its budget to the Assembly, and MLAs debate

the various proposals. If the Assembly approves it, the government can then

implement its plans. For example, if the state wants to build new schools or

hospitals, this proposal will be part of the budget.

Easy2Siksha

3. Oversight and Accountability:

o The Legislative Assembly also keeps an eye on the functioning of the

executive (the Chief Minister and the Council of Ministers). This is done by

asking questions during the session, debating policies, and passing

resolutions.

o An important function is the question hour, during which MLAs can ask the

government questions about its work. For example, an MLA might ask the

health minister about the steps being taken to control a disease outbreak in

the state.

o The debates and resolutions in the Assembly can help shape government

policies. For instance, if the Assembly debates the issue of farmer distress, it

could lead to the state government introducing new schemes to support

farmers.

4. Representing the People:

o The State Legislative Assembly serves as a platform for people to be

represented. MLAs represent the views and concerns of their constituencies.

They discuss local issues and bring them to the attention of the state

government.

o For example, an MLA from a coastal area may raise issues related to coastal

erosion and fishing communities during the Assembly session.

5. Impeachment and Removal:

o The State Legislative Assembly has the authority to remove the Speaker or

the Deputy Speaker if they are not functioning impartially. A resolution for

the removal of the Speaker can be passed if there is a majority in the

Assembly.

o The Assembly can also impeach the Governor if the need arises, although this

is a rare occurrence.

Conclusion

In summary, the State Legislative Assembly is a crucial part of the democratic process at the

state level in India. It consists of elected representatives who have the power to make laws,

control state finances, and oversee the functioning of the state government. The Assembly

also plays a key role in representing the people of the state and ensuring that the

government is accountable to them.

Through its legislative powers, financial control, and checks on the executive, the State

Legislative Assembly ensures that the state government remains responsive to the needs of

its citizens. By participating in debates, passing laws, and holding the government

accountable, the Assembly contributes to the smooth functioning of democracy in the

states of India.

Easy2Siksha

6. Discuss the appointment and role of Deputy Commissioner.

Ans: The Appointment and Role of the Deputy Commissioner in Indian Administration

The position of Deputy Commissioner (DC) is one of the most important administrative roles

in India. The Deputy Commissioner acts as the head of the district and plays a significant

role in both governance and public administration at the local level. This position holds

substantial responsibility, overseeing a variety of functions such as law and order, revenue

collection, administration, and development work within the district. Let’s break down the

appointment process and the role of the Deputy Commissioner in detail.

1. Appointment of the Deputy Commissioner

The appointment of a Deputy Commissioner is a well-established process in the Indian

administrative system. The role of the DC is typically filled by an officer from the Indian

Administrative Service (IAS). The process of appointing a Deputy Commissioner involves

several key steps:

• Eligibility: To become a Deputy Commissioner, an individual must be an officer of

the Indian Administrative Service (IAS). The IAS is the most prestigious and

competitive civil service in India. To become an IAS officer, candidates must first

clear the Civil Services Examination conducted by the Union Public Service

Commission (UPSC).

• Selection and Training: Once selected, IAS officers undergo rigorous training at the

Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration (LBSNAA) in Mussoorie,

where they learn various aspects of governance, administration, law, and public

policy. After the training, IAS officers are assigned to different states and districts,

where they begin their careers in various administrative roles.

• Posting as Deputy Commissioner: After gaining sufficient experience and fulfilling

specific criteria, an IAS officer can be posted as a Deputy Commissioner (DC). This

usually happens when the officer is promoted to a higher rank within the service,

often after serving in other administrative positions such as Sub-Divisional

Magistrate (SDM) or Additional District Magistrate (ADM).

• Role in District Administration: The Deputy Commissioner is usually appointed by

the State Government. While the appointment is made by the state, the overall

structure and selection process ensure that the DC has the necessary skills and

experience to handle the complexities of district-level governance.

2. Role and Responsibilities of the Deputy Commissioner

The role of a Deputy Commissioner is both vast and varied. It includes administrative,

executive, judicial, and development-related responsibilities. Here’s a breakdown of the

main functions:

Easy2Siksha

a. District Administration

The Deputy Commissioner is the chief administrator of the district. This means that they

oversee all the administrative functions of the district, ensuring that the state’s policies and

laws are effectively implemented at the ground level. Some of the key administrative

functions include:

• Coordinating Government Programs: The DC is responsible for ensuring the smooth

execution of government schemes and programs, especially those that involve rural

development, health, education, and poverty alleviation. For example, if the state

government launches a rural development program, the DC supervises its

implementation in the district.

• Revenue Administration: One of the core responsibilities of a DC is revenue

administration. This involves overseeing the collection of taxes, land revenue, and

maintaining records related to land ownership. The DC is also responsible for settling

disputes related to land and property in the district.

• Public Welfare: The DC plays a major role in managing the welfare of the people in

the district. This includes overseeing programs related to healthcare, sanitation,

social security, and disaster management. For instance, the DC might oversee the

distribution of ration under the Public Distribution System (PDS) or coordinate relief

efforts during a flood or earthquake.

b. Law and Order Maintenance

Another critical function of the Deputy Commissioner is to ensure the maintenance of law

and order in the district. In some states, the DC is also the District Magistrate (DM), and in

that capacity, they work closely with the police and other law enforcement agencies to

ensure that the district remains peaceful and free from unrest. Their responsibilities include:

• Supervising Police: Although the Superintendent of Police (SP) is in charge of law

enforcement, the DC has a supervisory role. The DC ensures that the police take the

necessary steps to prevent crime and maintain order.

• Crisis Management: The DC handles situations like communal disturbances, strikes,

or large public events that could lead to unrest. For example, during a major protest

or election-related violence, the DC would coordinate with police and other

departments to manage the situation.

• Judicial Functions: The Deputy Commissioner often has limited judicial powers,

especially when it comes to issues related to revenue or land disputes. For example,

the DC may be called upon to adjudicate matters related to land revenue, including

disputes over land ownership or taxes.

Easy2Siksha

c. Development and Economic Growth

Apart from administrative duties, the Deputy Commissioner also plays a pivotal role in the

economic and infrastructural development of the district. They oversee various

development projects that help improve the district’s economy and infrastructure, such as:

• Development of Infrastructure: The DC plays a major role in ensuring the proper

implementation of infrastructure projects, including roads, bridges, schools,

hospitals, and other public works.

• Promoting Education and Health: The DC is involved in promoting education and

healthcare services in the district. For instance, they may work with the District

Education Officer (DEO) to improve the quality of schools, or with the District Health

Officer (DHO) to promote health initiatives like vaccination drives.

• Social Welfare: The DC oversees social welfare programs aimed at upliftment of

marginalized sections of society. These may include schemes for women’s

empowerment, poverty alleviation, and welfare of backward classes.

d. Election Management

The Deputy Commissioner has a key role in the management of elections in the district.

They are responsible for the following:

• Election Officer: As the District Election Officer (DEO), the DC oversees the smooth

conduct of elections (both state and national) in the district. This includes managing

voter lists, setting up polling stations, ensuring the availability of ballot papers, and

monitoring the election process to ensure free and fair elections.

• Maintaining Voter Registration: The DC ensures that voter registration is accurate

and up-to-date in the district, which is essential for the smooth conduct of elections.

3. Challenges Faced by the Deputy Commissioner

The position of the Deputy Commissioner comes with its set of challenges. Some of the

common difficulties faced by a DC include:

• Managing Large Districts: In some states, a district may have a large population and

extensive geographical area, making administrative coordination a challenge. The DC

may have to deal with problems like rural-urban divide, poverty, and infrastructure

deficits.

• Political Pressure: As a government officer, the DC is sometimes subject to political

pressure, especially during elections. Balancing political interests while maintaining

impartiality can be challenging.

• Natural Disasters: The DC is often the first responder to natural disasters like floods,

earthquakes, or cyclones. Handling disaster relief and rehabilitation requires quick

decision-making and efficient management.

Easy2Siksha

• Maintaining Law and Order: In districts that have a history of communal tensions or

unrest, the DC’s role in maintaining law and order can be particularly challenging.

Handling such issues requires tact and diplomacy.

Conclusion

The Deputy Commissioner (DC) plays a vital role in the effective administration of a district

in India. They act as the bridge between the state government and the people, ensuring that

policies are implemented efficiently and that the welfare of citizens is prioritized. From

administrative duties to law and order maintenance, revenue collection, and development

work, the DC is responsible for ensuring the smooth functioning of the district. Despite the

challenges that come with this position, the role of the Deputy Commissioner is crucial in

the effective governance of India.

SECTION-D

7. Discuss the issues of Generalist versus Specialist in detail.

Ans: The debate of Generalist vs. Specialist in public administration has been an ongoing

and significant issue in the context of Indian administration. This issue primarily revolves

around whether public administration should rely more on generalists, who have broad

knowledge and skills across various areas, or specialists, who are experts in specific fields.

Both sides have their merits and drawbacks, and understanding this debate helps us

comprehend the structure of the Indian administrative system.

1. Generalists: A Broad Understanding of Administration

A generalist is someone who possesses a wide range of knowledge but may not have in-

depth expertise in any single area. In the context of public administration, generalists are

usually trained to manage a variety of administrative tasks, deal with different issues, and

hold leadership positions that require a wide understanding of policy, governance, law, and

management.

1.1 Role of Generalists in the Indian Administration

In India, the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) is made up of generalists. IAS officers are

expected to manage a wide array of functions and deal with diverse administrative tasks.

They typically start their careers in various districts, where they handle everything from law

and order to revenue management and public welfare. Over time, they are promoted to

higher levels of administration, where they manage entire departments or ministries.

The training of an IAS officer at the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration

(LBSNAA) focuses on a broad curriculum that covers areas such as law, economics, public

Easy2Siksha

administration, history, and management. This well-rounded training prepares them for a

wide range of administrative duties.

1.2 Advantages of Generalists

• Adaptability: Generalists can adapt to different roles as they possess knowledge

across various areas. They can easily move from one department to another without

a significant loss of efficiency.

• Holistic View: Generalists can take a more comprehensive view of administration,

seeing how different sectors and issues connect with each other. For example, a

generalist managing a rural development project will consider not just the technical

aspects but also the social, political, and economic factors that impact the

community.

• Leadership and Coordination: Generalists are often chosen for leadership positions

because they can bring different groups together. Their wide knowledge helps them

make decisions that take into account various perspectives and needs.

1.3 Disadvantages of Generalists

• Lack of Expertise: Generalists may not have the in-depth knowledge required to deal

with technical or specialized issues. For example, when dealing with a complicated

health crisis like an epidemic, a generalist may not have the specific knowledge of

medicine or public health management needed to address the problem effectively.

• Overburdened: Because they handle a wide variety of tasks, generalists can

sometimes be overwhelmed, leading to inefficiency or delayed decision-making.

2. Specialists: Expertise in Specific Fields

A specialist is someone who has deep knowledge and expertise in a specific field. In public

administration, specialists are often recruited to handle areas that require advanced

technical or professional expertise. These fields could include law, economics, engineering,

public health, finance, and so on.

2.1 Role of Specialists in Indian Administration

In India, specialists play an important role in various administrative functions, especially in

sectors that require technical expertise. For instance, in the Indian Economic Service (IES),

officers have specialized knowledge of economics and are tasked with formulating policies

related to fiscal matters. Similarly, the Indian Foreign Service (IFS) officers specialize in

diplomacy and international relations.

Specialists also occupy senior technical positions in ministries such as health, environment,

and education, where their expertise in these fields is crucial for effective decision-making

and policy implementation.

Easy2Siksha

2.2 Advantages of Specialists

• Expert Knowledge: Specialists bring in-depth knowledge of their fields, making them

valuable in areas that require specialized expertise. For example, in a ministry

dealing with health, having specialists in medicine, public health, and sanitation is

critical to crafting policies that are scientifically sound and effective.

• Efficiency in Technical Areas: Specialists can implement technical tasks efficiently

without needing to consult others for basic information. For instance, a public health

specialist would be better equipped to tackle a pandemic compared to a generalist

officer who lacks specific knowledge in the field.

• Policy Development: Specialists can contribute significantly to the development of

policies that require expert analysis and solutions. For example, a financial specialist

in the finance ministry can provide accurate forecasts and data-driven

recommendations that generalists may not be able to.

2.3 Disadvantages of Specialists

• Limited Scope: Specialists often have a narrow focus. This means they may not be as

effective when dealing with issues outside their area of expertise. For instance, an

expert in public health may lack the understanding of economic policy, making it

difficult for them to collaborate on broader development plans.

• Difficulty in Coordination: Specialists may sometimes struggle to work with

generalists because their narrow focus does not always align with the broader view

that generalists bring to the table. This can create issues in coordinating projects that

require a holistic approach.

• Over-reliance on Experts: Relying heavily on specialists can lead to an overemphasis

on technical knowledge, often neglecting the practical and political aspects that

generalists may understand better.

3. Generalist vs. Specialist: The Indian Context

In India, the debate between generalists and specialists has been a topic of discussion for

decades. The Generalist approach, embodied by the IAS officers, has historically been

favored in Indian administration due to its flexibility, adaptability, and ability to oversee

complex, multifaceted administrative tasks.

However, specialists are increasingly being recognized for their expertise, particularly in

specialized sectors such as finance, healthcare, and engineering. India’s growing and

complex governance needs require a blend of both approaches. For example, managing

India's vast rural development program involves a generalist who understands governance

and policy, alongside specialists in fields such as agriculture, rural finance, and infrastructure

development.

Easy2Siksha

4. The Need for Balance: A Hybrid Approach

Given the complexities of governance and administration in India, many experts argue that

the ideal administrative structure should not rely solely on generalists or specialists but

instead strike a balance between both. This is where a hybrid approach comes into play.

• Generalists can provide leadership, oversee coordination, and ensure that the

various aspects of governance work together seamlessly.

• Specialists can bring their expertise to specific areas, ensuring that technical and

complex issues are dealt with efficiently and effectively.

For instance, in the Ministry of Environment, a generalist might lead the ministry, but

specialists in environmental science, policy, and law would help in making informed

decisions and crafting effective policies. Similarly, a generalist officer in charge of a health

crisis might work closely with medical specialists, epidemiologists, and public health experts

to manage the situation effectively.

5. Conclusion

The Generalist vs. Specialist debate in Indian administration is crucial for understanding how

the system operates. Both generalists and specialists bring essential strengths and

weaknesses to public administration. While generalists offer flexibility, leadership, and a

comprehensive understanding of administration, specialists provide the in-depth expertise

necessary for tackling technical and complex issues.

A balanced approach, incorporating both generalists and specialists, is necessary for

effective governance. In the dynamic and evolving nature of Indian public administration,

fostering collaboration between generalists and specialists ensures that the administration

is both broad and deep, capable of addressing the varied and complex challenges that the

country faces.

8. Critically evaluate the relationship between permanent and political executive.

Ans: Critically Evaluating the Relationship Between the Permanent and Political Executive

in Indian Administration

In the Indian administrative system, the executive plays a central role in the implementation

of laws, policies, and decisions made by the legislature. The executive is divided into two

distinct components: the political executive and the permanent executive. Both of these

groups have different roles and functions but work together to ensure smooth governance.

Understanding their relationship is crucial to understanding how the Indian government

operates.

Easy2Siksha

1. What is the Political Executive?

The political executive consists of elected representatives who hold political power and

are accountable to the legislature and the public. In India, this includes:

• The President of India (the ceremonial head of state).

• The Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers at the national level (for the central

government).

• Chief Ministers and the Council of Ministers at the state level.

The political executive is responsible for formulating and deciding the policies of the

government. Their role is to oversee the administration and make high-level decisions on

matters such as lawmaking, national security, foreign policy, and economic strategy. Since

these positions are elected, the political executive directly represents the will of the people.

2. What is the Permanent Executive?

The permanent executive, also known as the bureaucracy, is made up of government

officials who are not elected but appointed to various administrative posts. These officials

are usually part of services like the Indian Administrative Service (IAS), Indian Police Service

(IPS), and Indian Foreign Service (IFS). They are career civil servants who hold office

throughout their careers and are not subject to political changes.

The permanent executive’s primary role is to implement the policies and decisions made by

the political executive. They also advise and assist the political executive in matters of

administration, governance, and policy formulation based on their expertise and

experience. Unlike the political executive, members of the permanent executive are

expected to be neutral, professional, and not influenced by political considerations.

3. Key Differences Between Political and Permanent Executives

Aspect

Political Executive

Permanent Executive

Selection

Elected by the people (via

elections).

Appointed based on merit and

seniority, usually through competitive

exams.

Tenure

Temporary – changes with

elections.

Permanent – officials serve for long

durations, often until retirement.

Role

Makes policies and decisions,

governs based on political

ideology.

Implements policies, advises, and

ensures smooth functioning of

government.

Easy2Siksha

Aspect

Political Executive

Permanent Executive

Accountability

Accountable to the legislature

and the public.

Accountable to the political executive,

not the public.

Political

Influence

Strongly influenced by political

ideology and party loyalty.

Expected to remain neutral and free

from political influence.

4. The Relationship Between Political and Permanent Executives

Though the political and permanent executives have distinct roles, their relationship is

deeply interconnected. They are complementary to each other and need to cooperate for

the efficient functioning of the government. Let’s explore how they interact:

a. The Role of the Political Executive in Policy Formulation

The political executive is responsible for setting the overall direction of government policies.

This includes decisions on economic reforms, security strategies, education, healthcare, and

foreign relations. However, political executives, due to their temporary nature and limited

expertise in administration, often rely on the advice and expertise of the permanent

executive (bureaucracy) for the practical implementation of these policies.

Example: In India, when the government decides to implement a new policy like the Make

in India initiative to boost manufacturing, the political executive (Prime Minister and

ministers) will formulate the basic framework of the policy. However, the bureaucracy will

be responsible for planning and implementing the policy on the ground, including setting up

infrastructure, providing funds, and liaising with industries.

b. The Role of the Permanent Executive in Policy Implementation

While the political executive makes the decisions, the permanent executive is responsible

for putting these decisions into action. Bureaucrats, who have deep administrative

knowledge, ensure that the policies are effectively implemented across different regions

and sectors.

For example, the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India Mission) was a major initiative

launched by the government. While the political executive set the agenda, the permanent

executive was tasked with managing the execution, such as organizing campaigns, building

toilets, and ensuring cleanliness in rural and urban areas.

c. Advisory Role of the Permanent Executive to the Political Executive

The permanent executive also advises the political executive on complex issues based on

their professional experience and expertise. For instance, a bureaucrat in the Ministry of

Finance might advise the political executive on matters related to taxation, economic

policies, or global financial trends. While the final decision rests with the political executive,

the permanent executive’s advice helps them make informed choices.

Easy2Siksha

Example: When the Indian government decided to demonetize currency notes in 2016, the

political executive (Prime Minister and Finance Minister) took the decision after consulting

with bureaucrats from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Ministry of Finance, who

provided insights into the logistics and potential challenges of such a move.

d. Tension Between the Political and Permanent Executives

Despite the need for cooperation, there can also be tension between the political and

permanent executives. Political executives may push for policies that suit their party’s

agenda or ideologies, while the permanent executive, which is expected to remain neutral,

may resist if it believes that these policies are impractical or detrimental to the country’s

long-term welfare.

Example: The India-Pakistan relations have often seen tension between the political

executive (especially when there’s a change in government) and the permanent executive.

The political executive may push for more aggressive stances against Pakistan, while

bureaucrats in the foreign service might advise caution, based on diplomatic considerations.

e. The Role of Bureaucracy in Crisis Management

During times of crisis, such as natural disasters, economic recessions, or national security

threats, the permanent executive takes the lead in managing and executing relief and

response measures. In such situations, the political executive may temporarily delegate

authority to bureaucrats to make quick, effective decisions.

Example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the government issued various policies, but it was

the bureaucracy that handled the logistics of testing, healthcare, and food distribution. The

political executive played a significant role in policy formulation, but the permanent

executive executed the plans at the ground level.

5. Challenges in the Relationship

There are several challenges in the relationship between the political and permanent

executives:

• Political interference in bureaucracy: Sometimes, the political executive may try to

influence the decisions of the permanent executive for political gain. This can

undermine the neutrality and effectiveness of the bureaucracy.

• Lack of coordination: If there is insufficient coordination between the two, the

policies might not be implemented effectively.

• Frequent transfers of bureaucrats: The frequent transfers of civil servants for

political reasons can disrupt their work and lead to a lack of continuity in

administrative functions.

6. Conclusion

The relationship between the political and permanent executives in India is one of

cooperation and interdependence. The political executive makes decisions and formulates

Easy2Siksha

policies, while the permanent executive implements them. However, this relationship can

be fraught with tensions, especially when the political executive exerts undue influence on

the permanent executive. For the Indian administrative system to work smoothly, there

needs to be a balance where both the political and permanent executives respect each

other’s roles and responsibilities, ensuring the effective functioning of the government and

the delivery of public services.

In essence, the political executive provides direction, while the permanent executive

ensures that the policies are executed on the ground in a professional and efficient manner.

Both are indispensable to the success of the Indian administrative system.

Note: This Answer Paper is totally Solved by Ai (Artificial Intelligence) So if You find Any Error Or Mistake . Give us a

Feedback related Error , We will Definitely Try To solve this Problem Or Error.